logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.08 2017고합446
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

71,500,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from October 1, 2006 to May 15, 2010, was serving as office staff in the labor law firm D located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si. From May 15, 2010 to May 15, 201, the Defendant is a “industrial disaster hub” under the name of accepting money and valuables from workers in industrial accidents who were recruited by oneself as the president of the executive branch from the EF members located in Yongsan-si, from May 15, 2010 to the present.

1. No person, other than an attorney-at-law who violates subparagraph 1 of Article 109 of the Defense Act, shall receive or promise to receive money, goods, etc. from legal cases as an agent, legal counseling, preparation of legal documents, and other legal affairs;

On May 2010, the Defendant consulted the patient G who wants to receive industrial accident insurance benefits with the method of claiming disability benefits under the Act on the Insurance for Industrial Accident Compensation and submitted a written claim for disability benefits to the Labor Welfare Corporation.

On May 24, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 1.2 million, among the industrial accident compensation insurance benefits that G received from the Labor Welfare Corporation, from the Defendant, under the name of the Defendant, from around August 8, 2012, in the same manner, from that time, the Defendant received totaling KRW 65,100,000,000 from August 11, 201, as in the attached Table 1 “Crimes List 1.”

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables from a person who is not an attorney-at-law, and dealt with agency, legal counseling, preparation of legal documents, and other legal affairs.

2. No one shall receive or promise to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits under the pretext of solicitation or arrangement with respect to cases or affairs handled by a public official who violates Article 111 (1) of the Defense Act;

around June 8, 2010, the Defendant received a disability pension from an industrial accident-related worker H who was receiving treatment by the F Council member of the said F Council member as “resting before the meeting of the field.”

arrow