Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
- Authorization and public announcement of an implementation plan for the adjudication - The name of an urban planning facility project (C Expansion Works (hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant - Public announcement: D public announcement of Daejeon Metropolitan City on May 24, 2013, and the E Central Land Expropriation Committee on March 24, 2015 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) announced on March 24, 2016 - The expropriation subject to expropriation: Fluor 403 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by the Plaintiffs among the land of this case 25.85/841 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on May 17, 2016”) - The expropriation date of the instant 20th adjudication on May 17, 2016: The Plaintiffs deposited the same KRW 5,272,340 and the instant appraisal corporation’s new appraisal corporation on the land of this case (hereinafter “the instant adjudication on the expropriation”) - the expropriation date of the instant 60th adjudication on each of the instant 25th appraisal corporations and the instant 26th appraisal corporation.
[Ground of recognition] Fact-finding, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 6, 7, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, 4 through 11 (including a branch number, if a branch number is available; hereinafter the same shall apply), the assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, and the plaintiffs alleged that the plaintiffs asserted that they purchased and owned the land among the land of this case, which is the site of an aggregate building (hereinafter "the building of this case"), which is not the purpose of site ownership, jointly with the couple
The instant shares cannot be identified as their location, and the Plaintiffs paid the same tax when purchasing the instant shares.
However, the defendant.