A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. from the Suwon District Court on December 11, 2008. On November 26, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million for a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong Site as a matter of violation of the Road Traffic Act on December 11, 2008.

On May 2, 2014, at around 15:20 on May 2, 2014, the Defendant driven the Category B Maz car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.14% from the 103 gold apartment units around the 103-dong to the front road of the apartment commercial building.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on detection of a host driver and report on the circumstances of a host driver;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, etc., and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of inquiry reports and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend a lecture is that the defendant drives a motor vehicle in the same kind of drinking driving force four times in a considerable drinking situation. However, in light of the fact that the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and took an attitude against his mistake, the defendant seems not to drive a motor vehicle again, there is no record of punishment higher than the fine, and there is no record of punishment higher than the fine, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc. are considered in the records as ordered.