The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 29, 2013, at around 02:55, the Defendant expressed the victim E and labor union issues at the “D” restaurant located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim’s face to the effect that “the victim is written with the company’s money”; (b) sent the victim’s face to the victim’s face twice at the victim’s face; and (c) shaking the victim’s head scam; and (d) booms the victim’s face twice at the victim’s face; and (e) continued to show the Defendant and the victim’s face to the outside of the restaurant; and (e) took part in drinking the victim’s face; and (e) took part in drinking the victim’s head scam.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, it can be acknowledged that the victim E has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.