A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 1993, the Defendant opened the Gangdong-gu Office of the National Bank of Korea and traded household checks. On June 15, 2007, the Defendant issued a check number E, face value 5 million won, June 15, 2007, and issued a copy of the household check in the “D” office located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and presented it to the Seoul Office of the National Bank on June 15, 2007, which is the date of presentment for payment, but did not receive the shortage of deposits. In the same manner, the Defendant issued a check of KRW 30,089,00 in total face value over eight times in the same manner as indicated in the attached Table 6 through 13, and each holder presented a payment proposal within the time limit, but did not pay each disposition of suspension of transactions on June 15, 2007.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 2(2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act (amended by Act No. 10185, Mar. 24, 2010); Articles 2(2) and (1) of the Act on the Control of Illegal Check Control Act (amended by Act No. 10185

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. The portion of dismissing the public prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the summary of the facts charged as to the violation of the Illegal Check Control Act as indicated in Nos. 1 through 5, 14, 15, and 16 of the annexed Table of Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Non-Indicted 1”) was established on or around June 24, 1993, and the household check was traded on or around July 1, 2007, the Defendant issued one check number F, face value, five million won, and the date of issuance at the place indicated on the above facts charged, and presented one copy of the household check as the Defendant to the new bank Boba within the period of payment presentation, but the Defendant did not receive on the grounds of suspension of transaction on June 15, 2007, as shown in the annexed Table No. 1 through No. 5, 14, 15, and 16.