1. The Defendants: (a) each of the Plaintiff A, KRW 44,064,054; (b) KRW 42,814,054; and (c) KRW 2,00,000; and (c) each of the above.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) D D D rocketing taxi (hereinafter “accidented vehicle”) around 00:53 January 6, 2013, 2013

(2) The road of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “road of this case”) shall be the road of Embrypt located in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.

A) A two-lane, one-lane, the two-lane runs from the 81km long-distance flooding side of the two-lane. D met the F crossing the road of this case to the port from the right side of the running direction of the vehicle involved in the accident to the front part of the vehicle involved in the accident. As a result, F died due to an advanced cerebral thale, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”). Around January 6, 2013, around 08:36, 2013 (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Defendant Kuma Transportation Co., Ltd. is the owner of an accident vehicle, and the Federation of the Korea Passenger Transport Business Association is the mutual aid operator who entered into a comprehensive automobile deduction agreement with respect to the accident vehicle.

3) Plaintiffs A and B are F’s parents, and Plaintiff C are F’s sentence. [Grounds for recognition: Facts that there is no dispute, the entries in Evidence Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, and 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts, the instant accident resulted in the death of another person due to the operation of the vehicle involved in the accident, barring any special circumstance, Defendant Kum Transportation Co., Ltd., which is the operator of the vehicle involved in the accident, shall be liable to compensate for the damages suffered by each of F and the plaintiffs pursuant to Article 724 of the Commercial Act. 2) As to the Defendants’ assertion on the exemption of liability, the Defendants are liable to compensate for the damages suffered by each of F and the Plaintiffs pursuant to Article 724 of the Commercial Act.

Even if there is no possibility of avoiding the accident, D is exempted from liability due to no negligence in relation to the accident of this case.

Gap evidence 6, Eul evidence 1-7 and all pleadings.