Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On August 2, 2018, the Plaintiff driven a temporary No. B 09:02 car (hereinafter referred to as “Abandoned car”) with a two-lane road in front of the “D” located in Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, along with a two-lane distance from the front line of the police box, the Plaintiff was driving along the same one-lane.
At all times, the central line is installed with yellow double-suling lines, and the speed limit is 50km/h, and the vehicle is large, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to observe the speed limit and not to take the opposite direction beyond the center line.
Nevertheless, while driving an Allied Car, the Plaintiff proceeded to the opposite direction beyond the median line in excess of approximately 28 to 30km/h of speed while driving the Abandoned Vehicle, and received the front portion of the F Bus driven by E (Nam, 57 years old) who normally proceeds one lane in the opposite direction.
(See A evidence 5-7 No. 4). Ultimately, the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s “one vehicle” in the following forest:
)과 같은 경위로 위 교통사고를 야기하여(갑 제5호증의 1 제3쪽 참조) 원고 스스로 비골 골절을 동반한 경골 하단의 골절 및 소장(小腸)의 손상 등 상해를 입고(갑 제1호증의 2 참조), 아이오닉 승용차에 동승한 원고 자신의 아들인(갑 제3호증 제4쪽 참조) G(남, 32세)에게(갑 제5호증의 7 제4쪽 참조) 약 12주간 치료가 필요한 좌측 요골-척골 원위부 개방성 골절 등 상해를, 위 피해 버스 운전자인 E에게 약 2주간 치료가 필요한 어깨 관절의 염좌 및 긴장 등 상해를 각각 입게 하였다(갑 제2호증, 갑 제5호증의 1, 갑 제7호증의 2 참조). D H 이에 대하여 원고는 이 법원에서 교통사고처리특례법위반(치상 죄의 유죄가 인정되어 2019. 1. 7....