Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2016, the Defendant, at the second floor of the Seoul Jung-gu C Building and at the second floor of the victim D, who was parked bruptly, reduced the front wheels of the victim D’s E Etrax XG passenger car and the front wheels of Fbenz car into one iron chain and was unable to move the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the second public trial shall be the date);

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 366 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the choice of a fine (to recognize the defendant's error, to consider the fact that the defendant has no particular criminal punishment history, except the suspension of indictment, and to the fact that he/she has not agreed with

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Division of a crime under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is against the order of provisional payment;

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is at the first floor of the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building around April 27, 2016, and that “this building is installed in the victim G tephra rail, Inc., Ltd., during the right of retention.”

“Placards arbitrarily removed the banner containing the content “.”

2. 판단 피고인에 대한 경찰 피의자신문 조서는 피고인이 그 내용을 부인하므로 이를 증거로 삼을 수 없고, 한편, 증거들에 의하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 이 사건 건물의 관리인인 증인 H은 이 법정에서 “ 피해자 회사가 퇴거하기 전부터 이 사건 현수막이 화단에 떨어져 다른 쓰레기와 엉켜서 뒹굴고 있었고, 자신이 낙엽, 흙더미와 뭉쳐서 뒹굴고 있던 이 사건 현수막을 한꺼번에 치웠으며, 어떠한 이유로 현수막이 떨어져 있었는지 모르겠다.

“The statement to the effect that” was stated, ② the witness D, the representative director of the victim, did not see that the Defendant directly removed the banner on April 27, 2016 in this Court.

Taking into account the stated facts, the remainder submitted by the Prosecutor.