Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around July 2017, the Defendant introduced the F of the representative director of (ju) E to the victim D at the hotel town located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The Defendant stated, “E app means a type of app with a seal attached to the stud that provides information about the four-day shop in Korea.”
On August 16, 2017, the Defendant continued to contact the victim on an influence, and “The amount of KRW 150 million out of the acquisition cost of KRW 250,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
“Falsely speaking,” and sent a contract prepared as if the F had entered into a new stock subscription contract with F.
However, the defendant did not have entered into the above F with the subscription contract, and the above contract was voluntarily prepared by the defendant for computer traffic, and even if the victim received the subscription price for new shares, the defendant did not intend to subscribe to the E shares.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and thereby, the defendant 50,000,000 won around August 19, 2017 under the pretext of the purchase price of new shares from the injured party.
8. 20. 50,000,000 won around 20. :
8. Around 29.29. Around 50,070,731 won was remitted and acquired a total of KRW 150,070,731.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. F e-mail prepared;
1. Application of a stock acceptance contract, remittance data, list of shareholders, details of transactions, corporate register, response data to financial institutions, and text message statutes;
1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence is reasonable, and the defendant sent a mobile banking screen that entered as if he remitted money to the LAB to the victim, and send a forged contract to the PDF file.