A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 03:35 on May 7, 2016, the Defendant: ‘‘(E in the front direction of Osan City D, when he was asked questions about the personal information of the above daily activities from G during the process of carrying out the 112 police box belonging to the Jindong Police Station of the Jindong Police Station called out after having received the report that Defendant’s daily activities were assaulted by the Defendant on May 7, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the above G, with his face being pushed off and pushed off on a part of the said G once, and “mara, dead and broken down on the road.”

“The threat was made”.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is [the scope of punishment] There is no person who has a basic area (from June to April 1) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] [the defendant has been punished several times by a fine by using past violence or obstructing police officers from performing their official duties, or by obstructing police officers from performing their official duties, and even if there are only one suspended sentence, the defendant again commits the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties in this case, which is unrecepted, or the degree of assault is minor, in consideration of all the reasons for sentencing. It is so decided as per Disposition.