The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case at around 03:00 on April 29, 201, the Defendant expressed that “a dial-a-a-the-spot is doing so.” The Defendant had the victim under drinking alcohol to “a dial-a-a-mail.” As the victim and Si expenses incurred, the Defendant saw the victim to “a dial-a-a-mail.” The Defendant followed the table table, cut back the bring, cut back the ske, cut back the ske, cut down the victim’s head, ske, cut back the ske, cut off the ske, cut off the victim’s face by drinking, cut back the breast part of the breast, etc., and put the victim into two parts of the number of treatment days to the victim.

2. At the time of the defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel, the defendant, who is faced with F (the male-friendly body of D) so that the victim of the defect who intends to sit in D is faced with the victim's disease, leaving the glass disease, and the defendant's left knished with D's face with tearing the tearer, and there was no flick or drinking, etc., which is a dangerous object, as stated in the above facts charged.

3. On the one hand, a protocol in which the investigative agency made the statement of the person making the original statement has a limit that the investigative agency has no choice but to have a very low probative value compared to the statement of the person making the original statement, which is an original evidence. In particular, in a case where the person making the original statement is unable to attend the court and cross-examine the court, a protocol in which the statement is written shall not be recognized as having a real value of evidence that can serve as the basis for the formation

Therefore, even though the defendant denied the facts charged and the statement made by the person making the original statement in support thereof, if the defendant was unable to attend the court and cross-examine by the defendant, the defendant's statement is accurately and in detail clearly and in detail, and even without going through cross-examination, the exact purport of the statement is as follows.