logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2015.07.15 2014가단37198
건물명도
Text

1. The defendants jointly indicate 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 6 of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, among the real estate in the attached

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The real estate indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) was owned by C and four persons. A Human Entertainment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ND”) purchased a collective housing on August 30, 2006 to build a collective housing on the land including the instant real estate site, and acquired the ownership on August 30, 2006. Nonparty 1 entered into a trust agreement with the Plaintiff on August 10, 2006, and completed the registration of ownership transfer to the Plaintiff on August 30, 2006.

나. 피고들은 2004. 12. 30. C과 사이에 이 사건 부동산 2층 중 별지 도면 표시 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈎부분 140.4㎡(이하 ‘계쟁부분’이라 한다)에 관하여 그 중 약 30평은 피고 B이 보증금 15,000,000원에 월 차임 100,000원, 임차기간 2년으로 정하여 임차하고, 약 16평은 피고 A이 보증금 10,000,000원에 월 차임 100,000원, 임차기간 2년으로 하여 임차하는 각 임대차계약(이하 ‘이 사건 각 임대차계약’이라 한다)을 체결하고, 각 임차부분에서 피고 B은 수학학원을, 피고 A은 피아노 학원을 각 운영하였다.

C. After that, following the process of public sale of the instant real estate, the Samchip Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted 2”) purchased the instant real estate and acquired its ownership on September 11, 2014. The Plaintiff again purchased the instant real estate in trust from Nonparty 2 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 11, 2014.

On October 15, 2014, Nonparty 2 filed an application for approval of a housing construction project plan with respect to the construction of apartment houses, officetels, and auxiliary facilities on the land including the instant real estate with the head of the Gun having achieved.

【Fact-finding without a dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1 through 8, Eul evidence 1-1 and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts of recognition, the parties seek the delivery of the dispute over ownership.

arrow