1. The plaintiff's rehabilitation debtor B shall confirm that the amount of KRW 55,317,800 is 55,300;

2. The plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant subcontracted the construction work of re-building of the apartment in the wife population to the Co., Ltd. to the Co., Ltd.

B. On February 19, 2013, the Plaintiff was an employee of the Co., Ltd., Ltd., and was engaged in the work at a height of 4m (4m) at the entrance of the apartment site at the instant construction site. However, while an employee belonging to the Defendant was entering a strings with the strings, the Plaintiff was faced with an accident of falling under fourm below the Plaintiff’s four meters, due to the Plaintiff’s listed strings up up up to the strings, and thereby, the Plaintiff suffered pressure from the pressure of the strings down of the upper left side of the upper part of the upper part of the road, the frame of the upper part of the upper part of the closed part of the lower part of the body, and the pressure of the closed part of the 3m frame.

C. B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Rehabilitation”) received a decision on April 14, 2015 when the instant lawsuit is pending, from the Seoul Central District Court 2015 Joint17, the Defendant was appointed as the custodian of the rehabilitation company, and the Defendant took over the instant litigation procedure.

Under the above rehabilitation procedure, the Plaintiff filed a report on the existence of damages claim amounting to KRW 107,570,775, including the interest rate of KRW 10,456,422 per annum from February 18, 2013, which was the date of the instant accident, to April 13, 2015, which was 97,114,333, and the interest rate of KRW 10,456,42, which was 13,000,000 prior to the date of the commencement of rehabilitation procedure. The Defendant filed an objection to the total amount of the Plaintiff’s reported amount of claims on December 18, 2015

[Grounds for Recognition: The entries in the evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 6, the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In full view of the above facts of recognition and the purport of the entire arguments, the defendant is a business owner who manages and supervises the construction site of this case and his employees employed by the contractor of this case to thoroughly conduct safety education for his employees so that they do not suffer from accidents, such as fall, etc. while performing the construction work of this case, and the place where workers might fall down at the risk of falling.