A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant, on May 30, 2017, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the main sentence of the Gwangju High Court before the Gwangju High Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2017.

[Criminal Facts]

1. The Defendant, based on the facts, is the representative director of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) established for the purpose of manufacturing and constructing plastic facilities in Macheon-si, Macheon-si, and F, as E business directors, is the general manager, and G, as the deputy head of E business.

H is the head of the Ban of the non-forest crop group of Gyeonggi-do I, and J and K are members of the Ban of the non-forest crop group of Gyeonggi-do I, who are engaged in the deep arts facility down farming in I, L is a person engaged in the deep arts facility down farming in M, N is a person engaged in the deep arts facility down farming in M, N is a person who is engaged in the greenhouse farming in Q in Gangwon-do, and P is a person who is engaged in the greenhouse farming in Q.

In order to create S in accordance with the R projects, the former TO paid 50% of the 50% of the cost of growing the greenhouse amount (do 15%, 35% of the military expenditure) as local subsidies; Q in Gangwon-do as local subsidies according to the T projects in 2013 as the cost of installing the facility of the greenhouse facilities (Gun expenditure 50%) as local subsidies; Gyeonggi-do U as part of the V projects in 2014 as part of the V projects in 2014 (W) (Do 20%, 30%) as local subsidies; 50% of the Y projects (military expenditure 50%) as local subsidies; and M Z projects as 50% (20% of the national expenditure, and 30% of the local subsidy); and the remainder of 50% as a subsidy project operator is required to undertake the project.

Although the Defendant and F, etc. knew that a subsidized business operator ought to bear part of the project cost as above, they pretend that the subsidized business operator bears the self-charges, and receive the excessive subsidies appropriated by the State and the relevant local government, and use them as part of the expenses, or use them for the construction of greenhouse houses, etc. already installed.