logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고단984
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 23, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B, who is an instructor, at the D Driving Institute located in Seoul, stating, “Acker’s operation cost is required. Acker’s operation cost is required. Acker’s guarantee is granted, and if a loan is granted, the loan will be paid promptly to prevent damage.”

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have been hospitalized in the hospital, and even if the Defendant had the victim guaranteed, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan.

On the same day, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a loan from a limited liability company merz S&K loan of KRW 3 million, by allowing the victim to provide a guarantee, and by allowing the third party to act on behalf of the victim, acquired pecuniary gains equivalent to the same amount.

2. On November 2011, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who is a police officer, at the same place as above 1.1, the victim E, who is a volunteer instructor, stating that “The operating cost of the fatine is necessary. It is necessary to obtain a loan, and if a loan is guaranteed, it will not be damaged by making a prompt repayment of the loan.”

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have been hospitalized in the hospital, and even if the Defendant had the victim guaranteed, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the loan.

On November 26, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained a loan of 4 million won from a State (State) Telecommunication Coin, Ltd., and made the victim provide a guarantee and made the victim pay it by subrogation, thereby obtaining pecuniary gains equivalent to that amount.

3. On December 14, 2010, the Defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F, as the same place as the above 1.3 on December 14, 2010, stating that “Isnatis is hospitalized in the patient room in Hyundai Asan Hospital, and must perform an operation urgently. Isatisf shall be repaid within one month if Isatisf is lent three million won.”

However, the defendant's personal obligation is equivalent to 10 million won.

arrow