beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall:
A. Of the 10,773 square meters of G forest land in Jinju-si, the attached Form 1 drawings are marked to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) B.
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) Defendant B is the Plaintiff’s forest land 37,686m2 (hereinafter “H forest land before division”) in Jinju-si.
(2) On September 16, 2008, Jinwon District Court, Jinwon District Court, on November 14, 1975, completed the registration of ownership transfer as of Jinwon District Court No. 17283. 2) The H forest was finally divided into 10,773 square meters of G forest (hereinafter “G forest”) in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, and thereby, the area of H forest was 23,803 square meters (hereinafter “H forest”).
3) On November 7, 2008, Defendant B donated H forest to Defendant C, D, E, and F. On November 7, 2008, the registration of transfer of ownership was completed on November 7, 2008 with Jinwon District Court Jinwon District Court Jinwon Branch Decision 59062. (B) Defendant B filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff’s father He (hereinafter “the deceased”). Defendant B filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff’s father He (hereinafter “the deceased”). Defendant B filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on November 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 62, and 45 with each of the above drawings indicated in 37, 39, 40, 41, 4242, 45, 5364, 57, 57, 54, 57, 57, 57, 54, 57, 7, 45, 7, 5, 7.
2) As a counterclaim, the deceased claimed the right to claim for the purchase of the ground water on the trees planted in the above part of the above part under the premise that he leased the above part from the defendant B, and on May 31, 1976, the plaintiff filed a claim for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the completion of the prescriptive acquisition on the part of the above part of the subordinate part. 3) The Changwon District Court changed the judgment of the first instance on February 17, 1994, and the judgment of the court of appeal on February 17, 1994, "the deceased delivers the above part to the defendant B, and the defendant B issued the judgment on May 31, 1976 that "the deceased shall implement the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the completion of the prescriptive acquisition on the part of the above part of the subordinate part."