1. Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5-a of the judgment of the defendant;

The crimes listed in [Attachment 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 are listed in [Attachment 3] Nos. 1.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of one million won on the grounds of fraud, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on December 5, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2017.

1. "2018 Highest 4382";

A. On June 20, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim L, stating that “If the Defendant had access to the open hold of P Q Q from one week prior to the front week via his/her mobile phone, he/she would send 70,000, a virtual currency, 12,500 won to the victim while communicating with the victim L, he/she would send 62,50,000 won to the victim in return.”

However, in fact, the Defendant received virtual currency from the victim and immediately commercialized it, and did not have any funds for living expenses, entertainment expenses, etc., so even if receiving virtual currency from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to send the consideration to the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 70,000 virtual currency Roco, which is a sum of 62,50,000 won and 12,500 Macoco, which is the sum of market prices of the same day from the victim, and acquired pecuniary profits equivalent to that of the same amount by transmitting 62,50,000 virtual currency moco, as a part of the

B. On June 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) connected the Victim R in one week prior to the front week with his/her mobile phone to the hosting room of the P Currency trading organization using his/her mobile phone; and (b) sold KRW 380,000, a virtual currency in total, KRW 15,200,000, to the victim while dialogueing with the Victim; and (c) purchase the Pacificco, which is the virtual currency equivalent to KRW 15,200,00, to the Defendant selling the said virtual currency.

“.......”

However, in fact, the defendant had the victim deposit the virtual currency price into the account under the name of S, and he runs as if he paid the price, and he did so from S.