1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts and

2. The court's explanation on this part of the plaintiff's assertion is the same as the pertinent part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination

A. Although there is no dispute between the parties that the stamp image attached after the name of C representative director of C of the settlement agreement (hereinafter “the settlement agreement of this case”) on the claim for the settlement of construction price of this case was made under C’s employee reduction (5). Meanwhile, the plaintiff asserted that C’s representative director and F, who actually operated the defendant, was bound by F, and the defendant’s representative director, affixed C’s employee reduction (5) to the settlement agreement of this case after obtaining F’s approval, and as such, I affixed C’s employee reduction (5) seal to the settlement agreement of this case after obtaining F’s approval, the following circumstances, i.e., the settlement agreement of this case was written on the premise that the contract of this case increased the contract price of this case, i.e., the settlement agreement of this case was written on the premise that C’s increase in contract price of this case was made under the premise that C’s increase in contract price of this case and C’s increase in contract price of this case was made on January 10, 2013.

The plaintiff also takes measures to prevent the use of the employee (No. 5) in C.