The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the suspension of the execution of two years in prison and forty hours in prison) is too uncomfortable and unfair;

2. The crime of this case is found to have a record of being punished several times as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, in particular, on January 27, 2005, the Jeju District Court recognized the crime of this case, and sentenced eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. However, although the defendant's mistake is recognized and the injury suffered by the victim of the traffic accident of this case is not relatively heavy, the defendant does not want the defendant's punishment by agreement with the victim only, and the defendant does not want the defendant's punishment, as seen earlier, by taking into account the following circumstances: the defendant's punishment after being punished for the violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.