beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. In purchasing each of the vehicles listed below by C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”), the Plaintiff leased money by concluding an installment financing agreement (hereinafter “each of the installment financing agreements of this case”) with the Nonparty Company for a period of thirty-six months as follows. At the same time as the registration of ownership in the name of the Nonparty Company, a mortgage was created between the Plaintiff and the Nonparty Company regarding the amount of the borrowed money as the bond value.
On October 21, 2013, BMW520 Ad D 60,500,000 45,300 on October 21, 2013; 1,447,320 1,447,320 on October 21, 2013; 34,200 115,5403,30330 on October 21, 2013; 208,858,86,200 on October 21, 208, 200 8,810,004,000 4,000 4,40,436, 940, 940, 208, 108, 108, 208, 108, 2014, 108, 205, 2014, 208, 2004, 2004
B. At the time of each installment financing agreement of this case, the representative of the non-party company was the intra-company director B who was on September 30, 2013, and was changed to the intra-company interest and J on February 3, 2014.
C. The joint and several sureties of each written installment financing agreement of this case is marked with the signature of B and the seal impression of B is affixed.
From October 25, 2013 to the Plaintiff, the non-party company paid the 25th day installment each month to the Plaintiff. On February 25, 2014, the non-party company lost its interest by delinquency in the payment of installment payments made on February 25, 2014. As of March 10, 2014, the non-party company’s installment financing obligation to the Plaintiff was KRW 193,505,659, and among them, the unpaid principal was KRW 180,818,948.
E. B, upon the Defendant’s marriage on March 29, 1984, 1 South and North Korea (1 South and North Korea) had been married with the Defendant, and the securities company was engaged in happy home life with the Defendant, but at the same time, the individual’s business was discontinued and the individual’s business was discontinued, and the Defendant was disputed with the economic problem. From around 2000, the Defendant’s verbal abuse and exercise of physical power, etc.