Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On April 23, 2019, the defendant driving the above taxi on April 22:42, 2019, and driving the taxi in the direction of the Jamban Station in the direction of the Jamban Station in the direction of the Jamban Station.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the back part of the victim E-working Fstunasi, which was left left to the left from the left side of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding to the right side of the vehicle due to the occupational negligence proceeding even though the vehicle is stopped signal, as part of the front part of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim E by negligence in the course of performing the above duties to inflict an injury on the base, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the victim G, a passenger of F si, suffered an injury on the base, such as the base, tensions, and tensions, which require treatment for about twenty days, and caused the victim H to inflict an injury on the base, requiring treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in E and G;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of recommendation [decision of types] according to the sentencing guidelines: General traffic accident [Type 1] there is no person causing a traffic accident (special person)] (the scope of recommendation field and recommendation range], the basic area of the recommendation range, and April through one year;

2. Determination of sentence;