Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has a duty of care to protect people by taking appropriate measures, such as putting a dog in the house.

Nevertheless, around 14:30 on February 17, 2014, the Defendant visited the house leased by the Defendant, as a director, the victim D (52 years of age) who was the owner of the house, which was the owner of the house, was damaged by the 505-dong C building B, due to the negligence that the Defendant neglected the construction of the dog in the small bank and neglected the construction of the dog, and due to the negligence that neglected the construction of the dog in the small bank and neglected the construction of the dog, and after asking the victim for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A medical certificate (Enepathy);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of a photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order: (b) the Defendant was the first offender and is led to the commission of the crime; and (c) the Defendant paid KRW 600,000 to the victim according to the decision of recommending reconciliation in the relevant civil procedure, although not agreed with the victim; and (d) the Defendant’s payment of KRW 500,00 to the victim is based on the prosecutor’s oral argument and the sentencing precedent of the same kind of case as the record, the punishment