Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for three years, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, “2017 Gohap 106,” even though he was aware that H had no right to lawfully transfer the existing building demolition project and the right to operate a restaurant within the field of the construction project of the I apartment reconstruction project of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, by acquiring money from the Hyundai Industrial Development Co., Ltd., the contractor, he was aware that he did not have the right to lawfully transfer it.

Defendant

A around April 2015, at K hotel coffee shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J, it is necessary to believe that modern industrial development was awarded a contract to Ma (51) the actual representative of the victim L Co., Ltd. for the removal of the I apartment building from the redevelopment association, and the inside was followed by the removal work for 11 years and 8 months after the end of the efforts.

“Falsely speaking,” and in a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name in the city of Embre on May 2015, 2015, the said M was awarded a contract for at least KRW 120,000 per square meter from the development of modern industries, and will be awarded a subcontract for at least KRW 110,000 per square meter.

In addition, whether friendly B is an executive officer of the association, and it is possible to reduce the right to operate the restaurant at the construction site.

“A false statement” was made.

Defendant

A is an executive officer of the I apartment redevelopment association who has the authority to jointly carry out the work of removing apartment units, a cafeteria, and a commercial building and other ancillary facilities to the above M at a coffee shop where the trade name in the vicinity of the O law office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government N is unknown on June 1, 2015, and is the legal representative of the above M.

The phrase “Defendant B” is introduced as follows: (a) as if Defendant B was able to receive the right to remove apartment buildings and the right to operate a cafeteria within the premises from the development of modern industry, the victim company entered into a subcontract agreement for the construction of studs (State) and the removal of existing buildings in the building reconstruction and improvement project for I apartment reconstruction and improvement project (the removal zone).