logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.02.20 2013고단1676
강제집행면탈등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.

Defendant

B, Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 1, 2013, Defendants A and B offered to Defendant C, Defendant B, and Defendant B, “On June 12, 2012, the creditor G received a compulsory decision to commence compulsory sale of F real estate in Y-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Daejeon District Court of Daejeon on June 12, 2012, and the record was registered. In addition, the above G also has a debt equivalent to approximately KRW 160 million for other creditors. On the other hand, the creditors may obtain additional seizure. Accordingly, the creditors may obtain additional seizure, and once the ownership of the above real estate was exceeded in the name of other persons, Defendant C and Defendant B received the above proposal.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired on February 14, 2013, in relation to the Daejeon District Court’s branch office registration in the Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Daejeon District Court, and the fact that Defendant A transferred the above real estate to Defendant C’s wife, notwithstanding the absence of the fact that Defendant C had the said real estate transferred to Defendant C, Defendant C prepared documents for completing the registration of ownership transfer under his own name; Defendant B entrusted the registration of ownership transfer to a certified judicial scrivener with documents necessary for the registration of real estate ownership transfer by Defendant A and Defendant C; and Defendant B entrusted the registration of ownership transfer to a certified judicial scrivener with the said certified judicial scrivener by having the said certified judicial scrivener file a false application for ownership transfer registration under the name of Defendant A and then transferred the said real estate for the purpose of evading compulsory execution

2. On January 25, 2013, the defendant A, who is the creditor of the defendant, lost the defendant in the lawsuit claiming the purchase price of goods filed with the Daejeon District Court Branching the defendant on January 25, 2013, and the same year.

3. 4. A list of property was submitted pursuant to the foregoing ruling to specify the property relationship (No. 2013Kao641) based on the foregoing ruling.

On May 2013, the Defendant submitted a list of property to the Daejeon District Court located in the New-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, the date of which May 2013, and land in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Defendant owned is land.

arrow