Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and ten months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a term of two years.

1.5 million won is shared by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

[Inasmuch as Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment on October 28, 201, with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in support for the development of the Suwon method, etc., Defendant A was sentenced to two years and six months, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 13, 2014.

Defendant

B On November 11, 2008, the Seoul High Court sentenced seven years of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (compact) at the Seoul High Court, and on May 20, 2009, sentenced one year of imprisonment at the Seoul High Court, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on July 11, 2015.

[2] Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendants were not the narcotics handler, they traded the Megatocule, which is a local mental medicine, as follows.

Defendant

B, on February 2016, he was aware of the first police officer.

E made a phone call to E to the effect that “A is changed to cost,” and “E was to trade 150,000 g gramphones with the consent of this.”

Defendant

B made phone calls to Defendant A to the purport that “A Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha,” and Defendant A received approximately KRW 500,000 from the front of the exit of 19:10 on February 4, 2016, in accordance with the orders of the above Defendant B, around 19:10 on February 4, 2016, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

Defendant

B around 17:40 on February 5, 2016, approximately 10 g phiphones were additionally received from E at the parking lot near the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City G market.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to purchase approximately KRW 150,00,00 from E phiphones in KRW 1.5 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the witness A’s legal statement (defendant B)

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to E;

1. Some statements made by the prosecution against the defendant A (including the statements made by the E) during the interrogation of the suspect (the net 16)

1. The statement in part of each of the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the defendant A by the prosecution (in a net time 17, 30);

1. Part of the statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol (netly 24) of the prosecution against the defendant B;

1. Defendant B