A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 17, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-do.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving duties of K7 cars.

1. On June 13, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driving the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.142% at around 23:50 on June 13, 202, and driving the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.142% on the surface of the old city, thereby driving the road in front of the distance of the 491 Man-dong square

At the same time, there are nights, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the steering and steering by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear of the person engaged in the driving business.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim D (ma, 63 years old) who was under the influence of signal at the front of the train due to negligence in failing to properly operate the operation system, and was driven by the victim D (ma, 63 years old) as part of the back-setting part of the vehicle in front of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by its occupational negligence, the injury to the victim D, such as climatic salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the victim F (F) of the said rocketing passenger car with approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as dump, tension, tension, etc. of the bones of wood that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.142% from the 4km section of approximately 4 km to the front of the 491 Man-dong Square, as it was exported from the H in the Gu-U.S. city G at a temporary border such as paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police concerning D's legal statement of the defendant;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a yellow survey report, and an accident site photograph;

1. Exemplary drivers;