logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.10.15 2019구합51282
견책처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff worked as the 12th volunteer soldier group C (Subrogation) group of the 52th volunteer soldier group.

B. On July 25, 2018, the Defendant rendered the Plaintiff a disposition of “one month of salary reduction” for the following grounds for disciplinary action.

1. The title of disciplinary action: A violation of the maintenance of dignity and the maintenance of dignity;

2. On April 3, 2018, a person subject to disciplinary action: (a) instructed a person subject to disciplinary action to sit at knee in his/her own kneee, leading him/her to sit at knee of the victim; (b) from May 26, 2017 to April 3, 2018, the 12th GOP Uniform Spane of the GOP Spane; and (c) ordered the victim, EF, and D to sit at knee of the suspect against his/her will by forceing the victim, EF, and D to sit at knee of the suspect against his/her will. (d) From May 26, 2017 to April 3, 2018, the victim forced the victim to sit at kne.

(hereinafter referred to as “Disciplinary Reason 1.” On June 201, 2017, a person subject to disciplinary action requested a victim F to keep his/her room in the register of the 12th volunteer group of the 12th volunteer group of the 52th volunteer group of the 52th volunteer group of the 2nd volunteer group of the 2nd volunteer group of the 2nd volunteer group of the 12nd volunteer group of the 2017 group of the 2nd volunteer group of the 12nd volunteer group of the 2nd volunteer group of the 2nd volunteer group of the 196th group

(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason No. 2”) around 12:30 on June 2017, 201, the Defendant exercised pressure against the victims of an employee company to prevent the victims of an employee company from raising any problem about his/her misconduct, by stating that “The employees and executive officers are faced with each other, since the senior commander of an employee company and executive officers are the multiple executives. (m) The senior commander of an employee company and executive officers are the same. (v) The senior executive officers are not the executive members of the company. If the employee love is placed in water, as a matter of course, he/she would be entitled to the first claim for whom anyone is responsible.”

(hereinafter referred to as "Disciplinary Reason 3") serious.

arrow