1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claim for a counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) added and reduced in the trial, is as follows.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ relevant net C (the deceased on December 7, 2008 and the deceased on December 7, 2008, hereinafter “the deceased”) had 3 South and North Korean women (the deceased on July 23, 1967, son E) between her wife D, and the Plaintiff is 3 South and North Korea, the Defendant is the Defendant, and F is the remainder of Korea.

B. The plaintiff and F filed a lawsuit against the defendant on May 1, 2010 against the plaintiff on the following: (a) the plaintiff and F had completed the registration of ownership transfer on the grounds of inheritance share among each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, which was owned by the deceased after the deceased's death; and (b) the defendant claimed for the registration of ownership transfer on November 13, 2009 against the plaintiff, F, etc. on each of the above real estate, for which the plaintiff and F completed the registration of ownership transfer on the grounds of inheritance (209Gahap4475), and against the defendant on May 1, 2010, the plaintiff and F claimed for the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the defendant at the time of the deceased's death as the real estate was trusted in trust to the defendant; and (c) the defendant claimed for the registration of ownership transfer on each inheritance share as well as for the return of the real estate under the name of the plaintiff and F, and claimed for the return of the money deposited in the deposit account of the deceased and claimed for inheritance.

(C) On February 10, 2012, a notarial deed asserted by the Defendant was made in the absence of two witnesses and was rendered in violation of Article 1068 of the Civil Act, and thus null and void on the ground that it violates the method of will as provided by Article 1068 of the Civil Act. (4) and (4).