Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle B and C.

On October 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 06:14, and led to the drive of the above vehicle at an insular speed, one lane, one of the three-lanes of the 3-lanes of the mountainsides in the vicinity of the west-gu, Southern-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the southnam-gu, the 401-7cheon-gu, the southnam-gu, the west-gu, the west-gu, the west-gu, the

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle according to the name of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the injury of the victim C (the 64 years old) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the left-hand side of the course by negligence in violation of the vehicle stop signal as it is, by shocking the victim C (the 64 years old) to the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused about 8 weeks of treatment to the victim, such as pulververization, dverging the right-hand side, slopings, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police victim against C;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A written diagnosis of victims;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black boxes and video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor, concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. For the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the nature of the crime in this case’s occupational negligence, degree of injury of the victim, etc. Meanwhile, considering the following circumstances, the sentence is determined as ordered by considering the following: (a) the Defendant’s confessions and reflects the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance, on the condition that the injured party would be paid KRW 30 million according to the said insurance; and (c) the Defendant has no criminal history for any criminal punishment; and (d) other circumstances revealed in the records and theories of the instant case.