1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 5, Gap evidence 7, 8, and Eul evidence 1 to 4:

On July 13, 1992, B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “B”) completed a resort condominium (hereinafter referred to as “instant resort”) with 251 guest rooms on the land outside Jinsung-gun, J, H, H, I, J, K, and L (hereinafter referred to as “instant guest rooms”) and sold to the general public the remaining guest rooms except for the guest rooms D, E, F, H, H, H, H, H, K, and nine guest rooms (hereinafter referred to as “instant guest rooms”)

8. 12. Around 251, a hotel operator reported on the accommodation business for 251 guest rooms of this case, and operated a tourist accommodation business.

B. On January 4, 2013, the Plaintiff was awarded a successful bid for the instant guest room and completed the registration of ownership transfer through the Youngcheon District Court’s Young-gu M auction procedure, and the same year.

3. On 29. 29. The Defendant submitted a public health business report to the effect that he will run a mutual accommodation business of “N hotel”, separate from “N hotel”, using only the instant guest room.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant report”). C.

The Defendant asked the Plaintiff’s business report to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the Ministry of Health and Welfare responded to the purport that “the guest room that applied for the business report falls under the part of the guest room already reported on the business, and that the new business report without taking measures such as the report on the previous business report constitutes a overlapping report on the same place, in principle, it is deemed impossible as it falls under the overlapping report on the same place, and that the business report may be returned if it does not meet the criteria for the classification of the business entities intending to operate the lodging business, and whether the facilities and equipment for the lodging business, such as the guest room and the guest room, are installed.”

The defendant on April 19, 2013.