logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.08.10 2017고단1834
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1834"

1. On February 4, 2015, the Defendant is expected to use the borrowed money only one month from the date of lending money to the victim D from “C” located in Net City B, Seocheon-si (hereinafter “C”).

‘False speech' was made.

However, at the time, the Defendant was under bad credit standing of KRW 20,000 due to financial debt 20,000,000, and there was no particular property, and the Defendant was living with the restaurant subsidy of KRW 2,30,000 per month, and there was no ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to the circumstance where he was prevented from lending the money equivalent to KRW 470,00,000 from the multiple bond holders, such as E, to return the money.

The Defendant received a total of KRW 226,200,000 from 42 times until May 7, 2015, including the transfer of KRW 10,000 to G account (H) in the name of F (H) in the name of the Defendant, which is the remainder of the Defendant’s internal year, immediately from the victim’s damage, and acquired it by obtaining a total of KRW 226,20,000 from May 7, 2015.

2. On February 14, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant that “The Defendant would use the credit card on a monthly basis and to repay the card amount with the principal that it lent.”

However, even if the victim uses the K Card, there was no intention or ability to pay the card price.

The Defendant used 24,166,720 won in total five times from April 10, 2015, including 1,000,000 won from the victim’s immediate receipt of the K card by the victim, from the victim’s end, and obtained financial benefits equivalent to the same amount from the time to April 10, 2015.

"2018 Highest 395"

1. Crimes against victims L;

A. The Defendant’s sole crime was committed on April 2016 by the Defendant, who was aware of the issue of employment of the son in the Ncafeteria operated by the Victim L in Ma in the Mayang-si, Namyang-si, and was aware of the problem of employment of the son.

arrow