1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On May 5, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) felled under vavadi, which is hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly hotly high; (b) taken care of the Plaintiff by suffering from her head in the rush poppy, she was suffering from “influoral cerebral cerebral hemosis, external cerebral hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemal hemally and she

On April 16, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition to determine the final disability grade 7 to the Plaintiff as class 4 (except for those who are not likely to have any trouble in the function or mental function of the neurosis).

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Eul No. 1-6 (including additional numbers), the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff alleged as the Plaintiff is a person with severe pain and verbal disability, who is unable to lead a single-parent’s daily life, and thus is unable to engage in a life-long labor since he/she cannot engage in daily labor. As such, the Plaintiff constitutes class 3 of disability grade 3 (a person who is unable to engage in a life-long labor due to considerable harm to the function or mental function of the neurosis).

Therefore, the instant disposition should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

B. The Plaintiff’s disability grade No. 4 alone is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s disability grade falls under higher grade than that of class No. 7 4 (except for persons with disabilities in the function or mental function of the neurosis, which remains easily), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Thus, the instant disposition cannot be deemed unlawful.

3. Therefore, we cannot accept the Plaintiff’s claim.