1. The defendant Austria Development Co., Ltd., and one asset trust for a stock company shall be jointly recorded in the annexed Table 1 of this Decree.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are the parties-related 1) Plaintiffs, as completed around October 2010, the Yeonsu-gu Incheon AO apartment (hereinafter “Plaintiffs’ apartment buildings”).

(2) Defendant Austria Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Austria Development”) is a co-owner of the 801 Dong, 802 Dong.

The apartment of this case is "the apartment of this case," which is "the first to fourth-six stories above ground and the second floor Agu main complex building of AP" on the ground near the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City AP.

The new company is the executor of the corporation, and the defendant corporation is the one asset trust of the defendant corporation.

The company is entrusted with the execution of the apartment of this case from the development of defendant Pasta, and the defendant Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. is not more than 'the defendant treatment Construction Co., Ltd'.

(B) The construction work of the instant apartment is the new construction work of the instant apartment. (B) Defendant Astro Development was conducted by the Incheon Metropolitan City Free Economic Zone Authority on May 10, 2012, with the approval of the project plan that newly constructs the instant apartment.

2) Around 2012, Defendant Daewoo Construction contracted for the instant apartment construction from Defendant Austria Development, and from June 4, 2012, the new construction of the instant apartment from around June 4, 2012. (c) As a result of the appraisal of right to sunshine, right to view, and right to privacy infringement, the results of the appraisal on the appraiser AR of this court are as shown in attached Table 2, as shown in attached Table 2, and the results of the appraisal on the right to view are as shown in attached Table 3, and the results of the appraisal on the right to view are as shown in attached Table 4 [Attachment 3], and as shown in attached Table 5 [Attachment 4] [Attachment 5].] The fact that there is no dispute on the result of the appraisal on the Plaintiffs’ apartment value decline due to the infringement of right to sunshine.

No. 1; the result of the on-site verification of this Court; the result of the appraisal of the appraiser AR; the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant newly constructed the apartment of this case, thereby in the apartment complex of the plaintiffs.