1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,811,100 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 2, 2016 to June 15, 2017.

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff is a person who runs the restaurant (hereinafter referred to as "the restaurant in this case") under the trade name of "C" in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant is a business operator who sells, leases, manages, and provides services related to the sales of a credit card investigator, such as a POS terminal (the combination of the functions of POF, cash register, and computer terminal).

Around October 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Defendant to support the device, which is a contract with the content that the Plaintiff approves the customer’s card by using the device supported by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant device”) and the Defendant relays the approval of the credit card transaction between the instant restaurant and the card company, which is a franchise store, and acts as an agent for the Defendant to purchase the card.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant contract.” From November 3, 2014 to February 1, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) divided the voluntary registration server of the instant package without obtaining the card signature from some customers; and (b) conducted the process for approval by dividing the registration server of the instant package without obtaining the card signature from some customers; and (c) the details for which the approval procedure was conducted through the said voluntary registration function are total of KRW 26,037,00.

The credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company's credit card company.

The Defendant did not provide the Plaintiff with an explanation as to the discretionary registration function while providing the instant license device according to the instant contract.

【In the absence of any dispute, the instant contract is established by the Defendant with respect to the existence of liability for damages arising from the respective descriptions of Gap's Nos. 1, Eul's No. 8, and 10, and the entire purport of the pleading.