A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a penalty of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on October 23, 2006, and a fine of KRW 1.5 million with the same court on November 13, 2012.

On August 9, 2013, at around 0:20, the Defendant driven B SP car from around 500 meters in the section of 500 meters from the front side of the Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, to the front side of the Daesan-gu in the same Gu-dong, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.178%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous offense: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement, inquiry statement, investigation report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking and the choice of imprisonment not less than three times);

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., circumstances favorable to the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances shall be considered in light of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. include: (a) the Defendant has no significant criminal records other than the criminal records subject to a fine twice due to drinking driving, etc.; (b) the fact of crime is contradictory to the fact of crime; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, etc. shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.