1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for modification and addition as follows.

(1) The Plaintiff’s assertion and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff are examined, and the first instance court’s determination is reasonable). The first instance court’s argument that “No reason exists” in the fifth page of the first instance judgment, and then added “The Plaintiff’s assertion to the effect that “The Defendant violated the Industrial Standardization Act, the Certification Regulations, etc., by stating a model name different from the sales products or entered the Defendant in a false serial number other than the model name.” However, as so alleged, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff exported the products purchased from the Defendant to Japan, and the Defendant’s mistake as above, caused damages that the Plaintiff could not receive the remainder of 20 million UN (Japan) from the relevant Japanese company. The evidence submitted by this court alone is insufficient to acknowledge this fact, and no other evidence exists to acknowledge this).”

On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the Defendant’s “Defendant” in the 5th page 12 shall be amended to the Defendant.

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(A) If the Plaintiff’s reference documents or reference materials submitted after the closing of argument are examined, it is difficult to reverse the above judgment even if the Plaintiff’s reference documents or reference materials were examined as of January 9, 2020, January 15, 2020, and January 20, 2020.