1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Details of ruling;

2. The assertion and judgment

(a) Facts of recognition;

나. 주장 및 판단 ⑴ 이 사건 토지의 현황평가에 대하여 ㈎ 당사자의 주장 ㈏ 현황평가의 원칙 및 불법형질변경의 증명책임 ㈐ 임야 개간과 관련된 법령의 내용 이 법원이 위 각 부분에 관하여 설시할 이유는 제1심 판결의 해당 부분 이유 기재와 같으므로, 행정소송법 제8조 제2항, 민사소송법 제420조 본문에 따라 그대로 인용한다.

㈑ 판단 ① 이 사건 토지의 1966년 이후 이용상황 변화 구 분 1966년 2013년 경작지 (전, 답) 771.6㎡ (전) 1,093㎡ 경사면 등 170.9㎡ - 도로 23.9㎡ 21㎡ 하천(구거) 229.6㎡ 82㎡ 앞서 본 바와 같이 이 사건 토지의 1966년 및 이 사건 수용재결 당시의 이용상황은 아래와 같다.

However, in light of the fact that the current drawing (Evidence No. 4) written on the basis of aerial photography in 1966 and the current survey result map (Evidence No. 10) produced at the time of the instant project or there is no particular change in the location of the road, it is reasonable to view that the previous cultivated area was maintained as a arable area, and the current road and ditch was reduced by maintaining the identity with the previous road and ditch, and that the area and the previous slope portion of the previous road and ditch were newly cultivated land.

② Since this portion of land in the current 1966 is already used as a arable land in 1966 as at the time of changing the form and quality of a 771.6 square meters among the current arable land, the change of the form and quality of a arable land was made before that portion of the forest land in the public register, and there is no evidence to prove that this portion of land was changed without such procedure, even though the permission, etc. was required for changing the form and quality from the forest land to the arable land at the time of changing the form and quality from the forest land, it shall be evaluated as