logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.10.04 2018고단1006
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 21, 2018, the Defendant forged an official document and copied the front and rear of the driver’s license with a knife onto a plastic card and attached a photograph of the Defendant on the photographic column of the driver’s license.

Ultimately, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a driver's license issued by the Commissioner of the Korean National Police Agency.

2. On May 27, 2018, the Defendant, at around 16:10, displayed a forged official document by presenting a forged driver’s license as one of his/her own, on the ground that he/she is driving a dump truck in the K-6 camp 3 gump fl unit located inside Pyeongtaek-si Skidong-Eup, thereby infringing on the signal, and thereby controlling the military police personnel.

3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving the dump truck without a driver’s license in approximately 16 km section from the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (2) to the road located in Pyeongtaek-6 camp 3 in the galp galp fump fump fump fump fump fump fump fump fump fump fump.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 225 of the Official Document), Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of forged official document), subparagraphs 1 and 43 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving without a license) of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of a sentence of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, even though the Defendant had been punished several times for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, was again driving without the instant license. In particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime even when he/she received a summary order of a fine by driving without a license on April 18, 2018, thereby forging another’s driver’s license and forging another’s license, and thus, the nature of the crime is good.

arrow