Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of C Co., Ltd.

피고인은, 코리아신탁 주식회사와 피해자 주식회사 에스엔에스건설이 부동산담보신탁계약을 체결하고 피해자 회사가 개발수임자로 지정되어 시행 중인 경기 남양주시 D 일대 E 철거공사 업무를 방해할 목적으로, 2012. 1. 19. 11:00경 위 철거 공사장 입구 도로에 F 5톤 찝게차 1대 및 봉고화물차량을 주차시켜 놓아 위 공사 출입차량의 업무를 방해하는 등 그 때부터 2012. 1. 25.경까지 찝게차 2대 등을 이용하여 공사차량이 통행할 수 없도록 도로를 막아 놓아 철거공사 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and G's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. A real estate security trust contract and a contract for removal works;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the provisional payment order

A. The Defendant asserts to the effect that it does not constitute a crime since the victim company took out the scrap metal while performing the removal work from around July 201 when he subcontracted the removal work from H to May 201, and that it merely prevents access roads to the lane to prevent the removal work.

C. However, “business” subject to the protection of the crime of interference with business under the Criminal Act refers to a business or business that is engaged in an occupation or continuously, which is worth protecting from infringement by other persons’ unlawful acts, and is not necessarily a lawful act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Do1747, Apr. 11, 2003). Whether it is a business worthy of legal protection.