beta
Text
1. The defendant,
A. Plaintiff A’s KRW 76,980,000; and
B. Plaintiff B’s KRW 5,000,000; and
C. Plaintiff C: KRW 7,850,000.
Reasons
1. As to the Plaintiff’s claim, the following facts can be acknowledged in light of the Plaintiff’s overall purport of evidence 2-2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, and the witness’s testimony and pleading, as to the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from July 27, 2017 to the day of complete payment, which is the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, to the day of complete payment.
Plaintiff
A claimed 5% per annum from March 10, 2009 to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case as damages for delay, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the due date. Therefore, the claim in this part by Plaintiff A is without merit.
A EF G
2. According to the purport of the Plaintiff B’s claim as indicated in subparagraph 2-1 and the entire pleadings, the following facts may be acknowledged. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay Plaintiff B damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from July 27, 2017 to the day following the delivery date of a copy of the instant complaint, which is the day of complete payment, to the day of complete payment.
Plaintiff
B claimed 5% per annum from December 15, 2009 to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case as damages for delay, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the due date. Therefore, the claim in this part of this case by Plaintiff B is without merit.
B.
3. As to the plaintiff C's claim
A. According to the purport of the entire statement and pleading as set forth in subparagraph 3, the claim 7,850,000 won may be acknowledged as indicated in the following table. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff C 7,850,000 won and damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from July 27, 2017 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case.
Plaintiff
C is claiming 5% per annum from December 12, 2014 to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the due date. Therefore, the claim in this part by Plaintiff C is without merit.
(b)..