beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 12, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Gwangju District Court on December 12, 2007, and on September 20, 2012, the same court was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).
On April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40, the date and time of the offense is around April 10, 2015; (b) however, according to the evidence below, the date and time of the offense is determined around April 22:40, 2015; and (c) the entry of the facts charged is deemed an error.
In the field of 2 km alcohol concentration of approximately 0.179% in blood alcohol level from the field of so-called Young-gu to the front side of the Young-gu in Gwangju Northern-dong, the vehicle was driven by B B benz with alcohol level of about 0.179%.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;
1. Previous convictions: Application of criminal records, repeated statements, copies of summary orders, and Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Probation, community service order, order to attend a lecture, and order to attend a lecture under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the defendant's drinking records (not less than four times of punishment due to sound driving, not less than fines), driving distance, blood alcohol concentration, the age, character and conduct, environment, health conditions, circumstances after the crime, etc. of the defendant, and all the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of the case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the