The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment, forty hours of order to complete education, and thirty years of employment restriction order) is too unreasonable. However, in light of all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of the instant case, even if considering the background leading up to the Defendant’s commission of fraud or indecent act against the victims, and the family relationship of the Defendant, it is not recognized that the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court on the grounds stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, in Part 9 of the judgment of the court below in Part 3, "Defendant B" shall be corrected to "Defendant B," and in the summary of the evidence, the part "B" in column 2018, 2009, in the part "B" shall be deemed as "the details of the account transaction in the name of M" and "the investigation report (the report of the AJ's hearing of witness)" in column 2018, 2919, shall be deemed as "the investigation report (the report of hearing of witness N's statement)", and the relevant part shall be corrected."