All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

The defendant asserting that the plaintiff's claim is the ground for the plaintiff's claim that the new construction of the "Egypies" under the contract from F Co., Ltd. with F, and that G, H, I et al. prepared to conclude a contract to receive the above construction again in the name of the plaintiff company, while I had the plaintiff company's corporate seal, he/she had the plaintiff company's corporate seal to the defendant.

On November 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) prepared the “Agreement for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Construction of the Construction Site; (b) written the name of the Plaintiff Company in Hadon Island; and (c) affixed the Plaintiff Company’s seal on the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Contract for the Construction Site to K representative Director; and

As such, the Defendant caused damages to the Plaintiffs by forging and exercising a subcontract agreement under the name of the Plaintiff Company.

2. According to the evidence evidence No. 6, No. 5, and No. 7 of the judgment of the court below, the defendant was indicted on the act of preparing a subcontract agreement as alleged by the plaintiffs, and was found guilty at the first instance court on the charge of forging a private document and conducting the above investigation document. However, the appellate court rendered a verdict of not guilty on the charge of forging a private document and conducting the above investigation document, and it can be found that the appeal was dismissed and the final judgment of not guilty became final and conclusive. Examining the grounds for innocence in the above appellate court, the defendant was delegated the right of the plaintiff company (the former trade name company L), to comprehensively delegate the right to prepare the documents such as the subcontract agreement, or was delegated such authority at least.

reasonable grounds to believe that there were reasonable grounds to believe

There are various circumstances to see.

In this regard, despite the above criminal judgment, the plaintiffs did not assert or prove that civil acts were committed, and the evidence already submitted is difficult to recognize the defendant's illegal acts.