The defendant's KRW 100,000,000 to the plaintiff and its related 30% per annum from May 14, 2010 to July 14, 2014.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, Gap evidence Nos. 1 (a loan certificate, and the fact that the seal under the defendant's name is based on the defendant's seal, since there is no dispute between the parties, it is confirmed that the seal was withdrawn by the defendant's seal, and thus the authenticity of the entire document is presumed to be established) and Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the plaintiff lent KRW 100,000 to non-party corporation D on May 14, 2010 as interest rate of KRW 3%, the due date for payment, July 14, 2010, and the defendant can recognize the fact that the above loan obligation was jointly and severally guaranteed on the same day, and there is no counter-proof.

2. The defendant's joint and several sureties's joint and several sureties's joint and several sureties's joint and several sureties's acquisition was made under the condition that the defendant is in charge of the representative director's office and the defendant is in charge of the representative director's office

One of the arguments, there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and it is not accepted.

3. If so, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 30% a year from May 14, 2010 to July 14, 2014; 25% a year from the next day to February 7, 2018; and 24% a year from the next day to the day of full payment. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.