Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
C’s operation process of the publication and sale business of the Ma is called “E,” and the issuance and sale business of “F,” which is a horse-spacing area, was operated on February 22, 2007. Around February 22, 2007, the Plaintiff’s husband, transferred the said “E” under the name of payment in kind, and changed its business registration under D and H(G leakage)’s joint name.
G around July 2007 entrusted C with the management of the “E”, C changed the publisher and editor of the “F” on July 11, 2007 to itself, and completed the business registration on July 13, 2007 with the trade name of “E”. On October 23, 2007, G registered its business with the trade name of “J” under the name of “J” under the name of one’s birth, and the publisher and editor registered its business with I as the publisher and editor and run the business of publication and sale of the said Maetype area.
C around June 6, 2008, G requested G to prepare an implementation contract to the effect that “the ownership of all tangible and intangible assets on the Internet and telecommunications businesses related to the venue and the horse shall be confirmed to have existed under H..” On June 24, 2008, G was registered under the name of K as an employee in charge of accounting, without notifying G around June 24, 2008. After closing the above “J”, the K closed the “F” around July 4, 2008, and registered the periodical of “M” under the name of K on the same day.
C A criminal complaint against C filed a complaint with C, K, and I on September 14, 2009, by embezzlement, embezzlement, etc.
On March 26, 2010, G made an agreement with C to the effect that “C shall pay KRW 63 million to G in installments, and G shall cancel the complaint, and thereby, G shall not be held liable for any civil or criminal responsibility as all the claims and obligations between C and G cease to exist” (hereinafter “instant agreement”).
G and H shall all the Plaintiff, who is the wife of G, around June 14, 2010, have the right to operate the business related to the issuance and sale of the existing Mammna Land and the right to claim the return of unjust enrichment.