1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that "the plaintiff shall obtain the approval of use on October 14, 2014" in Part 2, No. 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the plaintiff shall obtain the approval of use on October 15, 2014", "the plaintiff shall be "the defendant", "the defendant shall be "the plaintiff," and "the defendant shall assert the defendant," on the face 22,510,370 won after the offset under the agreement of this case, and on the face 6 of the second through 7, "the defendant shall assert the defendant," "the defendant", "the defendant shall make the defendant's assertion that the plaintiff should pay the defendant the late 2,510,370 won (the late 29,040,000 won late 23,470,370,000 won late 19,000 won)" (the defendant shall accept the construction cost, construction cost, restitution of unjust enrichment, and withdrawal of arrears)" as it shall be stated as follows.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and all appeals filed by the defendant against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed as it is without merit.