logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.09.17 2020고정388
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

Around 18:50 on February 19, 2020, the Defendant issued an order of 8 8 Sopyl niitrite (hereinafter referred to as “bresh”), which is temporary narcotics in the second group, as psychotropic drugs, at the Internet site (D) operated by the winners of the names in France, at the office of the Defendant located in Cheongju-si B apartment and C, the Defendant settled KRW 117,360,00 on the purchase price with the national bank card in the name of the Defendant.

In addition, in accordance with the order of the defendant in France, the person whose name is weak refers to the name (A) of the defendant, and the place of receipt is named as the "Sari-gu Cheongwon-gu B apartment and C", which is the domicile of the defendant, sent the place of receipt to the Republic of Korea through the air special class mail, and the air special class mail containing the above eight diseases, which entered into the Incheon Central Airport at around 07:30 on February 22, 2020, Incheon Jung-gu 272 at the Incheon Central Airport.

As a result, the defendant in collusion with the above-mentioned names, imported the 8mlance (total 158mlml) from France to the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (verification on the Internet site on which a suspect purchases a door);

1. Investigation report (verification of a package which has been purchased by a suspect on the Internet website);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification of physical cards of a national bank and details of withdrawal, which have been settled by a suspect, while purchasing a package of money);

1. Article 60 (1) 6 and Article 5-2 (5) 1 of the Act on the elective Management of Narcotics, Etc. concerning criminal facts, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reasons of the main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Confiscated Narcotics, Etc. include: (a) the fact that the defendant was found to not have committed a second offense due to his/her mistake; (b) the first offender; and (c) the fact that he/she was receiving a first cancer treatment; and (d) the

arrow