The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) in light of the various sentencing conditions in this case, the punishment sentenced by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Examining the various sentencing conditions of the instant case, it is favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant was aware of and against all the instant crimes, that the victims do not want the punishment of the Defendant by mutual consent with the victims, and that the Defendant supports two children due to negligence.

Meanwhile, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, who was sentenced to imprisonment more than three times with prison labor due to larceny, and performed three times within three years after the execution of the sentence was completed, by entering a restaurant or a tea operated by the victims, and drinking alcohol, taking advantage of the gaps in which the victims’ surveillance was neglected, and in light of the circumstances leading up to the crime, how the crime was committed, how the crime was committed, and how the damage was serious, and how the Defendant was punished for larceny. In particular, on June 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor due to larceny in the sexual branch of the Daegu District Court, and completed the punishment on March 30, 2016, and even during the period of repeated crime on March 30, 2016, it was disadvantageous to the Defendant.

As above, comprehensively taking into account all of the sentencing factors favorable to or unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, age, sexual conduct and environment, family relation, motive and background of the crime, method of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., as well as all of the sentencing conditions as indicated in the record and the theory of changes in the sentencing, and the court below appears to have sentenced the defendant to one year and six months of imprisonment within the recommended range of punishment (one year to four years and seven months) set forth in the sentencing guidelines, taking into account the aforementioned sentencing factors, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that could reduce the sentence of the court below at the trial.