A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2013, at around 22:10, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as dystrophal dyposis, etc., by having the victim go beyond her back, due to the victim C(54 years of age) and the scambling due to the problem of returning home, on several occasions. In order to avoid this, the Defendant had the victim go beyond her back to the support unit for the roadside trees in which the victim was suffering from the scambling of the 12 weeks of the 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs (including victims), investigation reports (Attachment of photographs), diagnosis reports, investigation reports (referring to the statements of witnesses D);

1. Relevant Articles and 262 of the Criminal Act and the choice of a penalty concerning facts constituting the crime: Articles 262 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: A suspended sentence shall be imposed as ordered in consideration of all the following circumstances in the sentencing guidelines for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the reasons for sentencing), including the range of recommended sentences [the group of violent crimes, assault crimes, Type 2 (Bodily Injury by Violence), the basic area (the special mitigation: .............................. in favor of him/her is recognized and reflected in the facts of crime, the fact that he/she has agreed with the victim, and the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine: The injury suffered by the victim is considerably significant: The reason why the crime was committed, the circumstances after the crime