logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.02.17 2020고단3049
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall pay 4,980,000 won to the applicant for compensation. The above order shall be issued.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, from September 2018 to November 2019, was working as a store in the F official agency G mobile phone store in the victim E operation of the victim of the victim of the instant subparagraph C and D, and was engaged in the business of managing and selling the inventory of selling products, such as mobile phones.

On April 2, 2019, the Defendant sold one cell phone (a model AIPXM-64SR) equivalent to KRW 1,496,000 at the market price, which was kept for the purpose of sale in the above cell phone store for the purpose of sale, to a mid-to 40% discount of 40-50% for H, and used the price for his own daily living expenses from that time to November 7, 2019, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table (1). The Defendant sold 15,096,70 won in total to a mid-to long-term mobile phone purchaser, including H, and embezzled the price by voluntarily consuming it.

2. Fraud;

A. On October 8, 2019, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol as if he were to pay the alcohol value at the “J” house of the Victim B operated in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and received alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 1,350,000 from the injured party, as well as the Defendant received alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 1,350,000 from the injured party by the same method seven times in total from November 8, 2019, as shown in the List of Crimes (2) in the same manner, even if he received alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 4,980,000,000,000, in total, as shown in the List of Crimes (2).

나. 물품대금 사기 피고인은 2019. 10. 28. 경 제 1 항 기재 장소에서 피해자 H에게 “ 내가 F G 대리점의 사장인데 360만 원을 현금으로 먼저 주면, 신규 에어 팟 20대, 국내에서 아무 문제 없이 사용할 수 있는 휴대전화 1대를 다음날 공급하겠다.

“.....”

However, the defendant was not the president of the above store and did not have the authority to dispose of the goods in the store, and the majority of the goods are already mentioned in paragraph 1.

arrow